🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," said the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and fit for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various politicians to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international debate continues, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.